It's also harder than I thought!

Discovered that I can't get away with random blobs of colour for all the people, especially not in the foreground... a) I wasn;t getting the right overall colour, and b) blobs don't look like people. So I created a colour palette of the main colours (I 'mixed' them myself!) and so limited my palette to the tones that would match the dusk sky in the final painting.

I also gathered up my resolve, banished my laziness and zoomed in to do some detail on the crowd in front.

While maintaining my casual, Impressionist excuse for impatience, of course ;-)

Maybe it is art....

I got bored of the people, so started on the billboards. I love how the medium allows for so much light. It's like the best of watercolour, oil and acrylic combined. Without any of the mess.

Also markers and pastels :)

Is this art? (part2)

Then, somewhere between trying to hand-paint (read Wacom tablet and pen) the circular holes of the Francis P. Duffy memorial and worrying about whether I could use the text tool for the inscriptions on it, I decided, f*ck it - this is not a homework assignment. I'm having fun. So I left the debate over art with teh memorial and moved on to the areas I originally thought would be cool to work on.

I desaturated the crowd so I could splash away with my paintbrush without having the original image dictate colour. Yes, I added a Bevel effect to the paint so it would look Impasto. Like I had squeezed the blobs of colour straight out of the tubes. I am now making up the rules as I go along...

I reckon if Van Gogh had a PC with Photoshop he would take full advantage of the medium...

That's my story and I'm sticking to it!

Is this art?

So I have some time on my hands, because I often freelance at agencies that book me in for weeks at a time, and then sometimes don't have enough work to cover all 8 hours of the day. I can't do a lot in these situations, because I'm almost always on computers with the bare minimum for my job, and I don't carry all my other project files with me all the time. Dropbox is pretty useful in these situations.

Anyway, mostly I have Photoshop and the Internet. And an appetite for creativity that won't quit. Today I started a new Photoshop project, but I'm not sure if it qualifies as art. You see, I'm lazy when it comes to certain things like drawing from memory. Lazy or perhaps just not confident enough that it will turn out looking right, and then I will have wasted time on it, when what I actually want to do is play around with colours and shadows and lighting and all the other cool effects you add on once the basic structure looks good. Colouring in, really.

The question that keeps going through my head while I'm doing this is: "is it art?"

Here is my base picture. It almost looks like a painting already, which is what drew me to it in the first place.

I'll be honest, I don't even really know where I'm going with it. Nevertheless, I've started copying out the shapes and thinking about the colours. (Maybe this is what the comic book colour team does?)

My art education kicked in and prompted me tostart at the back, so I could do layers towards the front. Then I realised this isn't paint, and it would work better to start from the front, so that the shape panels wouldn't block colour from behind.

At some point, while deciding how best to recreate the granite texture on the memorial stone in front, I decided that, to qualify as something that isn't just a copy of the original, I would have to insert some traditional art. So I made the tentative decision to avoid the Photoshop Gradient tool, and, after using the Noise filter, I decided I wouldn't use that again either.

Or the Bevel and Emboss, or Drop Shadow. Hmmm. My laziness safety switch just tripped.